It's not always postdural puncture headache: a case report and note to the astute anesthesiologist

Abstract Dural puncture is either diagnosed by unexpectedly profound response to medication test dose or development of a postpartum postural headache. Epidural blood patch is the gold standard for treatment of PDPH when conservative management fails. However, postpartum headaches can be resistant to multiple epidural blood patches. In such cases, preexisting intracranial processes should be considered and ruled out. We report here the unique case of a pregnant patient who developed a resistant headache in the postpartum period related to an incidental intracranial aneurysm. Subsequent treatment with endovascular embolization adequately relieved her symptoms. Early surgical consultation and a multidisciplinary team approach involving neurology and neuroimaging is required for successful management of patients such as the one described here.

Parálisis del nervio motor ocular externo luego de anestesia neuroaxial combinada epidural-espinal / Paralysis of the external oculomotor nerve after combined epidural-spinal neuroaxial anesthesia

Introducción: El abordaje del espacio subaracnoideo fue descrito por Quincke en el 1891. En la actualidad es práctica común para la realización de la anestesia neuroaxial subaracnoidea en las pacientes obstétricas. Las complicaciones descritas, asociadas a esto, son varias. Dentro de estas, la parálisis del nervio abducens o VI par no es frecuente y en ocasiones, no está relacionada a la punción ya que se produce días después del evento. Objetivo: Revisar la información relacionada con la complicación de parálisis del VI par. Presentación del caso: Paciente de 33 años de edad, femenina, de profesión médico, con antecedentes personales de migraña, historia de anestesia neuroaxial epidural sin complicaciones, que para la realización de una cesárea de segmento arciforme y salpinguectomia parcial bilateral, recibió una anestesia combinada peridural-espinal. El transoperatorio transcurre con estabilidad hemodinámica, hizo cefalea al tercer día del posoperatorio, que la atribuyó al antecedente de migraña y fue tratada sin evaluación por anestesiología con dipirona. A los 10 días de operada hace desviación de la mirada y diplopia, se diagnostica parálisis del VI par. Fue tratada por Neurología y se plantean varios diagnósticos diferenciales. Los estudios imagenológicos resultan negativos, se trató con vitaminas y se produjo remisión a las 6 semanas. Conclusiones: El diagnóstico de esta complicación es necesario ya que puede pasar inadvertida la relación con la anestesia y, por tanto, ser mal conducido su tratamiento(AU)

Introduction: The approach to the subarachnoid space was described by Quincke in 1891. It is now a common practice to perform subarachnoid neuroaxial anesthesia in obstetric patients. The complications described, associated with this, are several. Within these, the paralysis of the abducens nerve or sixth pair is not frequent and sometimes is not related to the puncture, since it occurs days after the event. Objective: To review the information related to the complication of paralysis of the sixth pair. Case presentation: A 33-year-old female patient, a physician, with a personal history of migraine, a history of epidural neuroaxial anesthesia without complications, who underwent combined epidural-spinal anesthesia for performing a cranial segment cesarean section and bilateral partial salpingectomy. The transoperative period runs with hemodynamic stability. There was headache three days after surgery, which was attributed to the migraine history and the patient was treated, without evaluation by anesthesiology, with dipyrone. At 10 days after surgery, the eyes are diverted and diplopia is manifested, paralysis of the sixth pair is diagnosed. She was treated by neurology and several differential diagnoses were proposed. Imaging studies are negative. She was treated with vitamins and remission occurred at six weeks. Conclusions: The diagnosis of this complication is necessary, since the relationship with anesthesia may go unnoticed and, therefore, its treatment may be poorly conducted(AU)

Cefalea postpunción dural con aguja espinal de bisel cortante aguja espinal de punta cónica: revisión sistemática / Postdural puncture headache with cutting spinal needle pencil point spinal needle: systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Postdural puncture headache is one of the most frequent complications that occurs after the puncture of the dura mater, resulting in the spinal fluid leakage, through the same and subsequent traction of brain structures. OBJECTIVE: To compare cutting spinal needle and pencil point spinal needle in the incidence of postural dural puncture headache. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search of scientific articles published since 2006 was carried out in the Pubmed, Science Direct, Clinical Key and EBSCO databases, which evaluates the incidence of postdural puncture headache in spinal needles with conical tip and cutting bevel, additionally, experts will be consulted in the area that should suggest literature related to this topic, which would not have been included in the search methods previously described. RESULTS: In total, 14 studies were selected in the population that suffered puncture of the dura mater after accidental, therapeutic or diagnostic lumbar puncture (LP) and the presentation of postdural puncture headache was measured according to the ICHD-3 beta criteria. It was found that there is a decrease in the incidence of postdural puncture headache with conical tip spinal needles, compared to spinal needles of cutting bevel. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence indicates that postdural puncture headache occurs less frequently, with low intensity and short duration in patients operated with a conical spinal needle, compared to the cutting bevel. In addition, according to the recently described pathophysiology, it is contradictory that conical spinal needles are called "atraumatic", so this review proposes a change in nomenclature that is most useful for the clinical anesthesiologist.

INTRODUCCIÓN: La cefalea postpunción dural es una de las complicaciones más frecuentes que se presenta posterior a la punción de la duramadre, lo cual produce salida de líquido cefalorraquídeo, a través de la misma y posterior tracción de las estructuras cerebrales. OBJETIVO: Comparar la aguja espinal de bisel cortante y la aguja espinal de punta cónica en la incidencia de presentación de cefalea postpunción dural. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica de artículos científicos publicados desde el año 2006, en las bases de datos Pubmed, Science Direct, Clinical Key y EBSCO, que evaluaran la incidencia de cefalea postpunción dural en agujas espinales de punta cónica y bisel cortante, adicionalmente se consultó con expertos en el área que pudieran sugerir literatura relacionada con este tema, la cual no hubiese sido incluida en los métodos de búsqueda previamente descritos. RESULTADOS: En total se seleccionaron 14 estudios realizados en población que sufrieron punción de la duramadre luego de punción lumbar (PL) accidental, terapéutica o diagnóstica y se midió la presentación de cefalea postpunción dural según los criterios ICHD-3 beta. Se encontró que hay una disminución de la incidencia de cefalea postpunción dural con las agujas espinales de punta cónica, en comparación con las agujas espinales de bisel cortante. CONCLUSIONES: La evidencia actual indica que la cefalea postpunción dural se presenta con menor frecuencia, baja intensidad y corta duración en pacientes intervenidos con aguja espinal de punta cónica, en comparación con la aguja espinal de bisel cortante. Adicionalmente, según la fisiopatologia recientemente descrita, es contradictorio que las agujas espinales de punta cónica sean llamada "atraumáticas", por lo que esta revisión propone un cambio en la nomenclatura que resulta de mayor utilidad para el anestesiólogo clínico.

Asociación entre meningitis y punción dural en ratas bacterémicas. Un análisis crítico / The Association between meningitis and dural puncture in bacteremic rats. A critical análisis

INTRODUCTION: The presence of an active bacteremia has been considered a relative contraindication to perform an intrathecal puncture due to the risk of causing meningitis or epidural abscess. However, a clear and definite causal relationship has not yet been demonstrated. OBJECTIVES: To determine the relationship between intrathecal puncture and the development of meningitis in sub-jects with bacteremia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experimental study in rats with chronic bacteremia to which dural puncture was performed. Meningitis was then evaluated by direct drainage of the cisterna magna and histopathological studies of brain tissue. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: 12 of 40 bacteremic rats that underwent intrathecal puncture developed meningitis. Previous administration of antibiotics seems to reduce this risk.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Se ha considerado la presencia de una bacteremia activa como contraindicación relativa para realizar una punción intratecal por el riesgo de provocar meningitis o absceso peridural. Sin embargo, aún no se ha podido demostrar una relación causal clara y definida. OBJETIVOS: Determinar la relación entre punción intratecal y el desarrollo de meningitis en sujetos con bacteremia. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio experimental en ratas con bacteremia crónica a las que se les realizó punción dural, luego se evaluó la presencia o no de meningitis mediante drenaje directo de la cisterna magna y estudios histopatológicos de tejido cerebral. RESULTADOS Y CONCLUSIÓN: 12 de 40 ratas bacterémicas a las que se le realizó punción intratecal desarrollaron meningitis. La adminis-tración previa de antibiótico parece disminuir este riesgo.

Lumbar puncture in patients using anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents / Punção lombar em pacientes usando anticoagulantes e agentes antiplaquetários

ABSTRACT The use of anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents has largely increased. Diagnostic lumbar puncture in patients taking these drugs represents a challenge considering the opposing risks of bleeding and thrombotic complications. To date there are no controlled trials, specific guidelines, nor clear recommendations in this area. In the present review we make some recommendations about lumbar puncture in patients using these drugs. Our recommendations take into consideration the pharmacology of these drugs, the thrombotic risk according to the underlying disease, and the urgency in cerebrospinal fluid analysis. Evaluating such information and a rigorous monitoring of neurological symptoms after lumbar puncture are crucial to minimize the risk of hemorrhage associated neurological deficits. An individualized patient decision-making and an effective communication between the assistant physician and the responsible for conducting the lumbar puncture are essential to minimize potential risks.

RESUMO O uso de anticoagulantes e de agentes antiplaquetários tem aumentado nos últimos anos. A realização de punção lombar diagnóstica em pacientes utilizando tais medicamentos representa um desafio, em função dos riscos de complicações hemorrágicas ou trombóticas, estas últimas em pacientes que interrompem o tratamento para a realização do procedimento. Não há ainda estudos controlados nem diretrizes específicas nesta área. Neste artigo de revisão, algumas recomendações são feitas, levando-se em conta aspectos farmacológicos destas medicações, o risco de complicações trombóticas de acordo com a doença de base, e a urgência na coleta do líquor. A avaliação cuidadosa destas informações e uma monitorização neurológica rigorosa visando a detecção e o tratamento precoce de complicações podem reduzir o risco de sequelas neurológicas decorrentes de hemorragia. Uma decisão individualizada e uma efetiva comunicação entre o médico assistente e o responsável pela realização da punção lombar é essencial para minimizar potenciais riscos.

Hematoma iatrogênico simulando lesão tumoral intradural lombar / Iatrogenic hematoma mimicking lumbar intradural tumoral lesion

Em um quadro clínico de lombociatalgia, o diagnóstico diferencial engloba uma variedade de possíveis etiologias. Descreve-se um caso de um doente do sexo feminino, com história de lombociatalgia incapacitante relacionada com hematoma intradural, consequência de punção lombar e drenado após laminectomia lombar. São revistas as várias séries descritas na literatura, assim como são discutidos os diferentes fatores de risco, quadros clínicos e estratégias de prevenção e tratamento.

In the presence of lumbar radicular pain, the differential diagnosis includes several possible etiologies. Here is described a case of a female patient with incapacitating low back pain and lumbar radicular pain caused by an intradural hematoma, consequence of lumbar puncture, surgically drained after laminectomy. The several series in the literature describing these cases are revised, and the different risk factors, clinical pictures, prevention and treatment strategies are discussed.

Why should we use atraumatic needles in lumbar puncture? / Por que usar agulhas atraumaticas em puncao lombar?

Diagnostic lumbar puncture is essential to the diagnosis of central nervous system infections, subarachnoid haemorrhage and others neurological diseases. Myeloradicular involvement or life-threatening adverse events due to the procedure are rare, but less severe complications are more frequent. Post-lumbar puncture headache is the most common complication, by spinal fluid leakage due to delayed closure of a dural defect. Therefore, the development of fine needles, with differentiated atraumatic bevel, has contributed to minimize that problem. These generically called atraumatic needles cause less deformation of the dura mater then the Quincke® ones. So, why don't we use these atraumatic needles?.

A punção lombar é essencial para o diagnóstico de infecções do sistema nervoso central, hemorragia subaracnoídea e outras doenças neurológicas. O comprometimento mielorradicular ou efeitos adversos que envolvam risco de vida como consequência do procedimento são raros, mas complicações leves são mais frequentes. Cefaléia pós-punção lombar é a complicação mais comum, secundária a escoamento do líquido cefalorraquiano por fechamento tardio de uma lesão dural. Consequentemente, o desenvolvimento de agulhas finas, com bisel atraumático, tem contribuído para minimizar o problema. Estas agulhas, chamadas genericamente de atraumáticas, causam menos deformação da dura-mater que as agulhas tipo Quincke®. Então, porque não usar estas agulhas atraumáticas?.

Cefalea pospunción dural en la paciente obstétrica / Headache after a dural puncture in obstetric patient

La punción lumbar o dural (PL), consiste en pasar una aguja a través de la duramadre hasta el espacio subaracnoideo, el cual está lleno de líquido cefalorraquídeo (LCR). Siempre que la dura madre o la aracnoides sean puncionadas, los pacientes están en riesgo de desarrollar cefalea pospunción dural. El objetivo de este estudio fue hacer una puesta al día sobre las causas, diagnóstico, prevención y tratamiento de la cefalea pospunción dural. La cefalea pospunción dural (CPPD) se comporta como un dolor de cabeza bilateral que se desarrolla dentro de los 5 días posteriores a la realización de PL y desaparece en una semana...

The lumbar puncture (LP) or dural puncture consist of to pass a needle through the dura mater until the subarachnoid space, which is full of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Whenever the dura mater or the arachnoid be punctured, the patients are in risk of to develop headache post dural puncture (HPDP). The aim of present study was to update on the causes, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of this type of puncture. The HPDP behaves likes a bilateral headache developed at 5 days post lumbar puncture and disappear at a week...

Postdural puncture headache; comparison between lumbar puncture needle no 25 G and 27 G

To evaluate the role of needle diameter in causing postdural puncture headache [PDPH] in patients undergoing elective caesarian section. Comparative cross-sectional study. This study was conducted in Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive care PNS Shifa Karachi over duration of six months. It was a cross sectional study of 100 patients, which were divided into two separate groups. Group I and Group II were given spinal anaesthesia with 25 gauge and 27 gauge Quincke needles respectively. In both the groups the patients were randomly selected and were blind to size of the spinal needle used. The data was analyzed using Chi-square test. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Two patients in 25-G group and one in 27-G group required additional general anaesthesia because of inadequate spinal anaesthesia. Thus, a total of three patients were excluded from the study. Five out of forty-eight patients in group 1 and one out of forty-nine patients in Group II suffered from post spinal headache. The proportion of patients with post spinal headache with 25 G needle is significantly more than those with 27 G

Post-dural puncture posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome

We report the case of a young patient with 36 weeks pregnancy, and an acute respiratory infection with severe bronchospasm, who developed an occipital headache and neck pain on the third day of inadvertent dural puncture during placement of combined epidural spinal anaesthesia for caesarian section. It was diagnosed as post-dural puncture headache until generalised tonic clonic siezures occurred the next day raising the suspicion of postpartum eclampsia or meningitis. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome was diagnosed on MRI of the brain which showed features of reversible ischemia in the posterior region of the brain. With anticonvulsant therapy and antibiotics there was complete resolution of neurological symptoms. We highlight the importance of high index of suspicion of this reversible encephalopathy .In obstetric cases with intentional or inadvertent dural puncture, with headache similar to post-dural punctural headache, and the essential role of neuroradiology in confirmation of the diagnosis, as placement of an epidural blood patch would be highly detrimental in these cases

Spinal subdural haematoma following traumatic lumbar puncture in a patient with normal coagulation profile

Spinal subdural haematoma following lumbar puncture is a rare cause of spinal cord compression with very few cases reported in the literature. It is usually associated with some predisposing factors like haemorrhagic diathesis, anticoagulant therapy, vascular malformation, tumour or trauma. The authors report a case of spinal subdural haematoma in a 30-year-old male following a traumatic lumbar puncture with no obvious coagulation disorder. The patient had a poor outcome with minimal improvement in paraparesis at last follow-up, even after timely decompression. Although coagulation abnormalities are commonly found in most of these cases, our case illustrates the fact that spinal subdural haematoma can occur even in the presence of normal coagulation profile and a high index of suspicion with early diagnosis and intervention is warranted to prevent irreversible neurological deterioration, especially following a traumatic lumbar puncture

Does postdural puncture headache left untreated lead to subdural hematoma? Case report and review of the literature

The patient was a 39-year-old pregnant woman who was scheduled for cesarean section. Spinal anesthesia was induced using a 26-gauge needle with an atraumatic bevel. Postoperatively, the patient developed cranial subdural hematoma manifesting as severe non-postural headache, associated with right eye tearing, fifth cranial nerve palsy and left hemiparesis. The diagnosis was confirmed by computed tomography scan. The patient was managed by careful neurological follow-up associated with conservative treatment and recovered fully after 12 weeks. Our report reviews the literature on 46 patients who developed a postdural puncture headache complicated by subdural hematoma following spinal or epidural anesthesia. It is possible that postdural puncture headache left untreated may be complicated by the development of subdural hematoma. Patients developing a postdural puncture headache unrelieved by conservative measures, as well as the change from postural to non-postural, require careful follow-up for early diagnosis and management of possible subdural hematoma. [c] 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

Epidurography

Since its introduction into clinical practice in 1921, millions of epidurals are performed daily around the world. Anesthesiologists were quick to grasp its use for prolonged or continuous analgesia and routinely use it alone or in combination with general anesthesia. It has been found to be associated with less complications as compared to spinal analgesia and has taken a major chunk out of spinal practice. The success of epidural depends upon successful location and deposition of drugs into the epidural space. Blind identification of epidural space by loss of resistance or negative epidural space pressure has resulted in mixed results. The figures vary among the researchers but in about 25-30% cases, drugs are deposited at wrong place [outside epidural space]. Epidurography offers the best method of confirming the needle or catheter tip location in the space, and has evolved itself a standard practice now. Although very rarely adverse reactions to the technique or the contrast media have been reported, the method is highly recommendable and the pain practitioners and anesthesiologists are encouraged to use it more judiciously

Una rara complicación de la anestesia epidural y subaracnoidea. Tumores epidermoideos espinales / A rare complication of epidural and subarachnoid anesthesia iatrogenic spinal epidermoid tumors

Los tumores epidermoideos espinales son tumores muy poco frecuentes, que pueden tener un origen congénito o iatrogénico. Los tumores de origen iatrogénico pueden formarse a partir de la implantación de fragmentos de piel dentro del espacio epidural o subaracnoideo, que posteriormente crecen. El arrastre de células epidérmicas se puede producir por un "efecto de biopsia" durante las punciones lumbares, por una inadecuada adaptación del mandril dentro de la aguja. El tiempo de latencia hasta la aparición de los primeros síntomas neurológicos puede estar entre los 2 y 10 años. Se localizan, principalmente, en la columna lumbar. Los signos y los síntomas varían según la situación, el sitio y la dimensión del tumor. Las manifestaciones clínicas tienen relación con su efecto compresivo y aparecen cuando este tumor adquiere un tamaño de 1,5 a 3 cm. y comienza a ejercer presión sobre las raíces nerviosas de la cola de caballo. El diagnóstico presuntivo se establece por el antecedente de alguna punción lumbar practicada en años anteriores, en un paciente que presenta la clínica antes mencionada, sumado al informe radiológico del hallazgo de una imagen con diferente densidad dentro del canal medular, de localización extramedular y próxima a la zona de la punción lumbar. El pronóstico es bueno por su benignidad anatomopatológica y el tratamiento es quirúrgico.

Spinal epidermoid tumors are very rare and their origin may be either congenital or iatrogenic. Iatrogenic tumors may originate from the implant of skin fragments within the epidural or subarachnoid space and later grow. The dragging of epidermic cells may occur from a "biopsy effect" during lumbar punctures due to an inadequate placement of the mandrel inside the needle. The time of latency until the appearance of the first neurological symptoms may be between 2 to 10 years. They are mainly located in the lumbar spine. Signs and symptoms vary according to the situation, site and size of the tumor. Clinical manifestations are related to their compression effect and appear when the tumor reaches a size of 1.5 to 3 cm and begins to exert pressure on the nerve roots of the horsetail. Presumptive diagnosis is based on the history of a lumbar puncture of some years back in a patient with the above-mentioned background of compressive symptoms added to the radiological report of an image with a different density within the medullar canal, located extra-medularly and near the area of the lumbar puncture. Treatment is surgical and it has a good prognosis due to it being anatomo-pathologically benign.

Os tumores epidermóides espinhais sao raros. Podem ser congenitos ou iatrogenicos. Os iatrogenicos originam-se da implantação de fragmentos de pele dentro do espaço epidural ou subaracnóideo que posteriormente cresce. O arrasto de células epidérmicas pode ocorrer por "efeito de biópsia" durante punções lombares com agulhas com mandril inadaptados. O tempo de latencia até o aparecimento dos primeiros sintomas neurológicos varia entre 2 e 10 anos. Os tumores se localizam, principalmente, na coluna lombar. Os sinais e sintomas variam conforme a situação, o sítio e a dimensao do tumor. As manifestaçoes clínicas associam-se a seu efeito compressivo e aparecem quando o tamanho do tumor atinge 1,5 a 3 cm e começa a comprimir as raízes nervosas da cauda eqüina. O diagnóstico presuntivo é estabelecido pelo antecedente de alguma punção lombar praticada em anos anteriores, em um paciente que apresenta o quadro clínico antes mencionado, além de um relatório radiológico do achado de uma imagem com diferente densidade dentro do canal medular, de localização extramedular e próxima da região da punção lombar. Por sua benignidade anatomopatológica, o prognóstico é bom, e o tratamento é cirúrgico.

Comparison of two pain scales in Indian children.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the faces pain scale and color analogue scale among children aged 6-12 years undergoing selected procedures (venipuncture, intravenous cannulation, intramuscular injection, lumbar puncture, bone marrow aspiration) and to compare the procedural pain in a child as perceived by the child, parents and health care professionals using the above mentioned scales. METHODS: This was a prospective, descriptive correlational study of children aged 6-12 years, who had undergone selected procedures. Children were assessed for their pain severity using Faces Pain Scale and Color Analogue Scale. Parents and health care professionals also independently assessed the child's pain using the same scales. RESULTS: 181 children who fulfilled the eligibility criteria were enrolled in the study. There was a significant positive correlation (R = >0.8) between both the pain scales. There was fair to moderate positive correlation (R = 0.29 to 0.58) of pain perception of child with parents and health care professionals. CONCLUSIONS: Faces Pain Scale and Color Analogue Scales seem to be appropriate instruments for measuring pain intensity among Indian children aged 6-12 years undergoing selected procedures.